Lutgarde ou Emme de NAMUR
vers 0990 - vers 1050 (~ 60 ans)
-
Nom Lutgarde ou Emme de NAMUR Naissance vers 0990 ?, ?, , ?, ?, 
Genre Féminin Description physique Les armoiries antérieurs à 1190 ne sont pas connues Etat - Titre ou Situation Comtesse de Namur Origine de la source Trophées du Duché de Brabant par Christophre Butkens supplement n°1 page n°49 Décès vers 1050 ?, ?, , ?, ?, Notes - #Générale#LIUTGARDE [Emma] de Namur . The Vita Arnulfi names "Lugerdam, Godam, Ermengardam" as the three sisters of "Albertus comes Namurcensis". The Gesta Abbatem Trudonensium names "Lutgarde filia Hermegardis Namurcensis comitissæ, Ottonis prefati ducis filie" as wife of "Ottonis comitis de Los", parents of Balderic II Bishop of Liège. The Genealogica ex Stirpe Sancti Arnulfi names "Hadewidem et Emmam de Los" as the two daughters of "Ermengardis [filiæ Karoli ducis]". From a chronological point of view, an additional generation in the family of the Comtes de Looz, between Rudolf (967) and Gislebert (1044/46), would not be surprising. Nevertheless the chronology is tight for a daughter of Albert I Comte de Namur & his wife Ermengardis (married in 990) to have been the mother of Balderic Bishop of Liège (installed as bishop in 1008), unless the latter's installation was in his adolescence (not impossible but requiring Papal dispensation, of which no record has been found). m OTTO Graf van Looz, son of RUDOLF & his wife ---.
Source:http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/NAMUR.htm#_Toc121658709
ID personne I68023 Généalogie Méresse et Facon Dernière modif. 9 nov 2024
Père Albert Ier de NAMUR, n. vers 0970, ?, ?, , ?, ?, d. vers 1012, ?, ?, , ?, ?, (Âgé de ~ 42 ans) Mère Hermengarde ou Adélaïde de LORRAINE, n. vers 0970, ?, ?, , ?, ?, d. après 1012, ?, ?, , ?, ?, (Âgé de ~ 43 ans) Mariage vers 0990 ?, ?, , ?, ?, Age au mariage Lui : ~ 20 ans - Elle : ~ 20 ans. ID Famille F5343 Feuille familiale | Tableau familial
Famille Giselbert ou Othon de LOOZ, n. vers 0985 d. 1060 (Âgé de ~ 75 ans) Mariage oui, date inconnue Enfants + 1. Giselbert de LOOZ d. vers 1045, ?, ?, , ?, ?, + 2. Otto de LOOZ, n. vers 1027, ?, ?, , ?, ?, d. Estimé 1101, ?, ?, , ?, ?, (Âgé de ~ 74 ans)+ 3. Emmon de LOOZ, n. vers 1030, Looz, , , Limbourg, Belgique, d. Estimé 1047, ?, ?, , ?, ?, (Âgé de ~ 17 ans)ID Famille F5329 Feuille familiale | Tableau familial Dernière modif. 9 nov 2024
- #Générale#LIUTGARDE [Emma] de Namur . The Vita Arnulfi names "Lugerdam, Godam, Ermengardam" as the three sisters of "Albertus comes Namurcensis". The Gesta Abbatem Trudonensium names "Lutgarde filia Hermegardis Namurcensis comitissæ, Ottonis prefati ducis filie" as wife of "Ottonis comitis de Los", parents of Balderic II Bishop of Liège. The Genealogica ex Stirpe Sancti Arnulfi names "Hadewidem et Emmam de Los" as the two daughters of "Ermengardis [filiæ Karoli ducis]". From a chronological point of view, an additional generation in the family of the Comtes de Looz, between Rudolf (967) and Gislebert (1044/46), would not be surprising. Nevertheless the chronology is tight for a daughter of Albert I Comte de Namur & his wife Ermengardis (married in 990) to have been the mother of Balderic Bishop of Liège (installed as bishop in 1008), unless the latter's installation was in his adolescence (not impossible but requiring Papal dispensation, of which no record has been found). m OTTO Graf van Looz, son of RUDOLF & his wife ---.
 |
Rejoignez nous ! |